<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adventures in Voting!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://micahtillman.com/2008/02/12/adventures-in-voting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://micahtillman.com/2008/02/12/adventures-in-voting/</link>
	<description>Philosophy, Politics, Religion, Etc.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Stevens</title>
		<link>http://micahtillman.com/2008/02/12/adventures-in-voting/#comment-1502</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://micahtillman.com/2008/02/12/adventures-in-voting/#comment-1502</guid>
		<description>Well, I wouldn't be too sure about that.  One of the reasons I don't blog myself is I do much better reacting to other people rather than being proactive myself.  I'm nothing special in regards to my own ideas, though I believe I do have a talent at analyzing other people's.

I should say that I encourage anybody who doesn't support McCain to give a protest vote in whatever manner they believe most effectively communicates the nature of their protest.  The remaining primaries are "free" for protest votes and I believe that Republican voters have the duty and obligation to express to McCain exactly where they disagree with him.  He's going to be the Republican candidate so you should tell him where you think he's wrong.  Perhaps he'll change his mind.  

One of the things I disliked about the Bush presidency was how conservatives rolled over for him far too often.  It was only during his second term (immigration most notably) that conservatives dared to criticize Bush.  I understand why this happened.  The left was piling on Bush so egregiously unfairly that it was natural and reflexive for the right to protect him and not pile on themselves.  But ultimately, I think it was bad for Bush, bad for conservatives, and bad for the country that the right wasn't willing to criticize him more often (particularly on Iraq and spending).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I wouldn&#8217;t be too sure about that.  One of the reasons I don&#8217;t blog myself is I do much better reacting to other people rather than being proactive myself.  I&#8217;m nothing special in regards to my own ideas, though I believe I do have a talent at analyzing other people&#8217;s.</p>
<p>I should say that I encourage anybody who doesn&#8217;t support McCain to give a protest vote in whatever manner they believe most effectively communicates the nature of their protest.  The remaining primaries are &#8220;free&#8221; for protest votes and I believe that Republican voters have the duty and obligation to express to McCain exactly where they disagree with him.  He&#8217;s going to be the Republican candidate so you should tell him where you think he&#8217;s wrong.  Perhaps he&#8217;ll change his mind.  </p>
<p>One of the things I disliked about the Bush presidency was how conservatives rolled over for him far too often.  It was only during his second term (immigration most notably) that conservatives dared to criticize Bush.  I understand why this happened.  The left was piling on Bush so egregiously unfairly that it was natural and reflexive for the right to protect him and not pile on themselves.  But ultimately, I think it was bad for Bush, bad for conservatives, and bad for the country that the right wasn&#8217;t willing to criticize him more often (particularly on Iraq and spending).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renaissance Guy</title>
		<link>http://micahtillman.com/2008/02/12/adventures-in-voting/#comment-1498</link>
		<dc:creator>Renaissance Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://micahtillman.com/2008/02/12/adventures-in-voting/#comment-1498</guid>
		<description>Andrew Stevens, do you have to be so much smarter than I am?   :)

I just have one comment to make in response.  I don't know if you are hearing what I am hearing, but lots of people are saying that they will not cast their one vote for John McCain.  When you add up all those single votes, it makes a difference.  Of course, I don't really have to tell you that.  As I said, you are smarter than I.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Stevens, do you have to be so much smarter than I am?   :)</p>
<p>I just have one comment to make in response.  I don&#8217;t know if you are hearing what I am hearing, but lots of people are saying that they will not cast their one vote for John McCain.  When you add up all those single votes, it makes a difference.  Of course, I don&#8217;t really have to tell you that.  As I said, you are smarter than I.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Stevens</title>
		<link>http://micahtillman.com/2008/02/12/adventures-in-voting/#comment-1490</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://micahtillman.com/2008/02/12/adventures-in-voting/#comment-1490</guid>
		<description>Renaissance Guy, I don't think that anybody would argue that voting against McCain in a primary (where he is now all but unopposed) is throwing a vote away.  Some people might argue that not voting for one of the two major party candidates in the general election is throwing your vote away, but that's a whole other thing.  (Personally, I wouldn't argue that since I don't believe one vote could possibly have any effect on a national election anyway.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Renaissance Guy, I don&#8217;t think that anybody would argue that voting against McCain in a primary (where he is now all but unopposed) is throwing a vote away.  Some people might argue that not voting for one of the two major party candidates in the general election is throwing your vote away, but that&#8217;s a whole other thing.  (Personally, I wouldn&#8217;t argue that since I don&#8217;t believe one vote could possibly have any effect on a national election anyway.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renaissance Guy</title>
		<link>http://micahtillman.com/2008/02/12/adventures-in-voting/#comment-1489</link>
		<dc:creator>Renaissance Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 06:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://micahtillman.com/2008/02/12/adventures-in-voting/#comment-1489</guid>
		<description>Good for you!  I'm also tired of voting for he lesser of two evils.  In the deepest part of my soul, I belive that you did the right thing.

My primary is two weeks away.  I will not vote for John McCain.  I don't care who tells me that I'm throwing away my vote.  I'd rather throw away my vote than my conscience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good for you!  I&#8217;m also tired of voting for he lesser of two evils.  In the deepest part of my soul, I belive that you did the right thing.</p>
<p>My primary is two weeks away.  I will not vote for John McCain.  I don&#8217;t care who tells me that I&#8217;m throwing away my vote.  I&#8217;d rather throw away my vote than my conscience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://micahtillman.com/2008/02/12/adventures-in-voting/#comment-1481</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://micahtillman.com/2008/02/12/adventures-in-voting/#comment-1481</guid>
		<description>Ha ha!

Micah voted for McCain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha!</p>
<p>Micah voted for McCain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Stevens</title>
		<link>http://micahtillman.com/2008/02/12/adventures-in-voting/#comment-1480</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://micahtillman.com/2008/02/12/adventures-in-voting/#comment-1480</guid>
		<description>It doesn't matter, since Thompson won't get any delegates, but if he did, those delegates would almost certainly go to McCain, whom Thompson has endorsed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter, since Thompson won&#8217;t get any delegates, but if he did, those delegates would almost certainly go to McCain, whom Thompson has endorsed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Thompson &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Adventures in Voting!</title>
		<link>http://micahtillman.com/2008/02/12/adventures-in-voting/#comment-1478</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Thompson &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Adventures in Voting!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://micahtillman.com/2008/02/12/adventures-in-voting/#comment-1478</guid>
		<description>[...] James Joyner wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptFred Thompson is still on the ballot in Maryland. So I voted for Thompson. (*uproarious laughter*) But not only is Thompson on the ballot, you have to vote for delegates to the Convention independently. &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] James Joyner wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptFred Thompson is still on the ballot in Maryland. So I voted for Thompson. (*uproarious laughter*) But not only is Thompson on the ballot, you have to vote for delegates to the Convention independently. &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
