<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is Government? pt. 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://micahtillman.com/2008/06/19/what-is-government-pt-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://micahtillman.com/2008/06/19/what-is-government-pt-2/</link>
	<description>Of all the Micah Tillmans in the world -- and there are at least three -- ... I am this one.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:18:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micah Tillman</title>
		<link>http://micahtillman.com/2008/06/19/what-is-government-pt-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2883</link>
		<dc:creator>Micah Tillman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://micahtillman.com/?p=459#comment-2883</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s called &quot;exploring the idea,&quot; Jeff, not &quot;creating more questions than answering the old ones,&quot; and it has a long and noble intellectual tradition. *grin*

I think you&#039;re right that most people think about this issue in these terms, if they think about it at all. 

But I don&#039;t care for the moment what an ideal (Plato) or excellent (Aristotle) government would be, or what government should do, etc. I want to know what makes both the best and worst governments (both George Washington&#039;s and George W&#039;s, for instance) recognizable as a government.

Another way of putting it: what is it about the things we call &quot;governments&quot; that makes it legitimate to call them &quot;governments&quot; even though some of the are juntas, others are representative republics, others are dictatorships, others are communist, others are monarchies, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s called &#8220;exploring the idea,&#8221; Jeff, not &#8220;creating more questions than answering the old ones,&#8221; and it has a long and noble intellectual tradition. *grin*</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re right that most people think about this issue in these terms, if they think about it at all. </p>
<p>But I don&#8217;t care for the moment what an ideal (Plato) or excellent (Aristotle) government would be, or what government should do, etc. I want to know what makes both the best and worst governments (both George Washington&#8217;s and George W&#8217;s, for instance) recognizable as a government.</p>
<p>Another way of putting it: what is it about the things we call &#8220;governments&#8221; that makes it legitimate to call them &#8220;governments&#8221; even though some of the are juntas, others are representative republics, others are dictatorships, others are communist, others are monarchies, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffsdeepthoughts</title>
		<link>http://micahtillman.com/2008/06/19/what-is-government-pt-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2871</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffsdeepthoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://micahtillman.com/?p=459#comment-2871</guid>
		<description>I wonder if there are actually two questions floating around in the question &quot;Do you know what government is?&quot;
The first &quot;Do you know what government should be?&quot; ( Related questions: What&#039;s the platonic form of government; what was it intended to be; how best would a theoretical government work)
The second is &quot;Do you know what the government actually is right now?  
Presuming their is a gulf between question 1 and question 2, working on the assumption that it has drifted/mutated/been perverted from what it should be doing, it seems like an ideal politician would have a plan for getting us from where we are to where we should/ want to be.
Isn&#039;t it always easier to create more questions than answer the old ones?
;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if there are actually two questions floating around in the question &#8220;Do you know what government is?&#8221;<br />
The first &#8220;Do you know what government should be?&#8221; ( Related questions: What&#8217;s the platonic form of government; what was it intended to be; how best would a theoretical government work)<br />
The second is &#8220;Do you know what the government actually is right now?<br />
Presuming their is a gulf between question 1 and question 2, working on the assumption that it has drifted/mutated/been perverted from what it should be doing, it seems like an ideal politician would have a plan for getting us from where we are to where we should/ want to be.<br />
Isn&#8217;t it always easier to create more questions than answer the old ones?<br />
;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
